HYDROGEN GENERATOR DIY POWERFUL GAS ALTERNATIVE HHO WATER MAKE HYDROGEN

burnhippiesforfuel on Mon, 9th Mar 2009 9:48 am 



try a programmer like hypertech or superchips?

b3r3tta95 on Tue, 10th Mar 2009 2:08 am 



But wouldn’t the ECU make adjustments to keep it running at stock settings?

mikehauss on Thu, 12th Mar 2009 2:22 pm 



If this is going to provide a boost to automotive fuel economy, it can be turned on when releasing the accelerator. Then, the hydrogen could be stored somewhere and made available for subsequent applications of the accelerator.

prakkari on Sat, 14th Mar 2009 1:51 am 



Go to waterpoweredcar . com and there you will find some of the blueprints and info on Stan Mayers car. You are doing it all wrong there. Study his plans. I think he got it somehow right. At least you can run a car efficiently with no polution, free gas, but you would have to charge it up in the evening. So electrical car, with hydrogen combustion hybrid. The point is not breaking the laws of thermodynamics, but to get rid of fossil fuel. You could charge with wind turbine and solar cells.

shapokliyak on Mon, 16th Mar 2009 4:51 pm 



I really don’t understand how anyone can think this will increase a car’s mileage. It takes more energy to create the fuel than can be produced by consuming the fuel. Making seemingly scientific statements like “20-30% increased mileage” doesn’t change that fact.

pallymeat on Thu, 19th Mar 2009 4:12 am 



sure, air that is more dense produces more power because there are more oxygen molecules in the same volume of air when it is cooler, therefore more fuel can be added and more power made. But your just after the cooling effect so your better off with alcohol injection, which will vaporize easier and burn more effectively being that it contains chemical energy as a fuel itself.

quickcooper61 on Sun, 22nd Mar 2009 6:01 am 



uhhh actually when the air temp is reduced you get air that is more dense…. and the more dense the air is the more fuel there is there for you get more energy out of the same volume… correct? I agree that it does not “aid” in combustion but the plain fact is that by injecting tiny amounts of water you end up demanding a more powerful spark but in the end you gain more our of the engine not just “merely” reduce the temp to prevent knocking

moriszen on Tue, 24th Mar 2009 5:35 am 



The theoretical energy you get from burning the hydrogen is equivalent to the energy needed to separate the H2O into H2 + O .. but you engine is not 100% efficient (only ~15%) so the short answer is NO it wont work .

pallymeat on Wed, 25th Mar 2009 11:03 pm 



Water is not used in performance engines to aid in combustion. Water is far from flammable and requires you to have more spark just to attain the same amount of combustion. Water is injected in performance engines merely to reduce temperature and prevent detonation ( knocking ).

fishcake1235 on Sat, 28th Mar 2009 8:51 pm 



Fail - the Iron is coming from the stainless steel, NaCl is corrosive so is electrolyses

861147 on Sun, 29th Mar 2009 5:20 pm 



I think if it’s made with precision machined materials it might be efficient enough to help our motor vehicles run with ~20-30% increased milage.

rovidius2006 on Tue, 31st Mar 2009 10:00 am 



brown gas may aid combustion of gas a little, ,small amounts of water is pumped in some performance engines to aid combustion,it will be probably highly inefficient to run entirely on brown gas since it takes more to produce less,invention of a special chemical to speed up the production of brown gas or hydrogen may change hystory

gainpro on Wed, 1st Apr 2009 5:52 pm 



my uncle got some plans off a web site (secrete for some reason) and got his suv to run with something like this.

rent2ownnz on Fri, 3rd Apr 2009 6:39 am 



I agree with you at this point…. you would need at least need 5% of the mixture to make the engine run at any efficiency gain…. Produce enough hydrogen to make a difference…. and due to the periodic table weight and mass of this gas …. you would need a massive storage tank …

ossyni on Fri, 3rd Apr 2009 3:29 pm 



firestarter!

swrn2fn on Sat, 4th Apr 2009 12:31 am 



If you increase the number of tubes to 4 or 5 it will draw less amps and produce a lot more gas vapor

xXKentoXx on Tue, 7th Apr 2009 7:20 am 



making hydrogen gas at home is pretty much bad for the enviorment, do you know where they produce electricity? they use oil,coal,gas power plants(well most of them)

ClanBez on Fri, 10th Apr 2009 7:26 am 



I love all your other videos, they’re awesome but this is the worst hho video ever. You should not use salt because of the clorine, it’s dangerous. Check out what other people are doing and make a new video. Again, all your other vids are awesome, don’t mean to be to hard.

wolfdude117 on Mon, 13th Apr 2009 6:01 pm 



isn’t the fumes coming out are toxic?

LaughMakerz on Sun, 19th Apr 2009 6:10 pm 



this guy could be a good joker for a batman movie, hear him laugh at the end

Markemark44 on Mon, 20th Apr 2009 9:25 am 



Thankyou! Very informative. Please post more for us less-than-skilled folks that want to try this!

markweimer82 on Wed, 22nd Apr 2009 6:44 pm 



Energy is not being created. Nobody is talking about 100% efficiency. Your engine will run more efficiently, though it make not make a difference in mileage. Normal air mixutre is less that 1% hydrogen. Increasing this number is better for even combustion.

markweimer82 on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 9:47 pm 



Instead of you car getting the normal fuel air mixture (less than 1% hydrogen), your engine is getting a mixture in which the with increased hydrogen. Hydrolisis will only complement cold air intake, not replace it. It theoretically works. However, you would have to make a whole heck of a lot of that stuff to have an impact.

bigrich439555 on Tue, 28th Apr 2009 2:17 am 



has anyone tried using a power inverter that is used to power house hold apliences in a car to get the hho gas faster

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!